In the article “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” known author Mike Rose makes claims on how individuals and groups of people view each other based on their level of education. Even though many individuals would argue against Rose, he continues to complain that blue-collared jobs should require specialized skills, should be respected, and shouldn’t hinder social rank.
A blue-collar person is a working class person who often performs manual labor. People often assume that blue-collar workers are less educated, therefor making them less intelligent. Mike Rose was raised in a family of blue-collars, or working class people. Both of Rose's parents barely had educatio.
In Mike Rose’s article “Blue-Collar Brilliance”, Mike attempts to address a cultural assumption about blue-collar jobs, as well as recover the reputation of manual labor. The assumption he works to dismiss was that people who were in blue-collar jobs were not intelligent and not deserving of the respect given to white-collar workers and professionals.
The data Blue-Collar Brilliance by Mike Rose targets offering an educated insight regarding the usage of intelligence in blue collar jobs. Rose goes another mile to dispute the claim and reveal the assertion that intelligence is acquired through formal schooling which white-colored-colored-colored collar jobs find that need intelligence to complete.
Blog. June 15, 2020. Hold more effective team meetings with Prezi Video; June 12, 2020. What it takes to run a great virtual all-hands meeting; June 11, 2020.
In a similar manner, Mike Rose author of Blue-Collar Brilliance also has a similar belief that college doesn’t teach the skills one needs to succeed as an adult and to find a worth-while job. Rose endorses the importance of blue-collar jobs, hands on jobs that don’t require an education. A few examples that Rose gives of blue-collar jobs are: waitressing, running a factory line and.
Rhetorical Analysis In this essay you will see my rhetorical analysis of Blue Collar Brilliance by Mike Rose and Shop Class for Soulcraft by Mike B. Crawford. I will be analyzing using the six rhetorical strategies that I learned about last week. I hope to come to logical conclusions pertaining to each strategy and exhibit my knowledge of these strategies in the process.
This essay will compare Charles Murray's arguments with Sanford Ungar's from “7 Misperceptions About the Liberal Arts” and I will compare their arguments and conclusions. In relation to Charles Murray and Sanford Ungar, I will be discussing what Mike Rose thinks in his essay “Blue-Collar Brilliance”.